Eight US states have just released a Multi-State Action Plan to
guide efforts to put 3.3 million zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) on their roads by
2025.
Last
October, governors from eight states – California,
Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island and
Vermont – announced their “ground-breaking” initiative to put over three million
zero-emission vehicles on the roads in their states within a dozen years.
The governors joined
forces in a bid to “to revolutionize the automobile market by promoting
zero-emission vehicles”. Now they have put forward their action plan.
“Use of these clean
vehicles will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve air quality and public
health, enhance energy diversity, save consumers money, and promote economic
growth,” their statement said.
Zero-emission
vehicles include battery-electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid-electric vehicles,
and hydrogen fuel-cell-electric vehicles. These technologies can be used in
passenger cars, trucks and transit buses, the governors add.
This multi-state
effort is intended to expand consumer awareness and demand for zero-emission
vehicles. As a first step in this plan, the governors have identified specific
actions they will promote within their states and joint cooperative actions the
states will take to help build “a robust national market” for electric and
hydrogen-powered cars.
They agreed to pursue
the following efforts:
- Harmonize
building codes to make it easier to construct new electric car charging
stations
- Lead
by example by including zero emission vehicles in their public fleets
- Evaluate
and establish, where appropriate, financial and other incentives to
promote zero emission vehicles
- Consider
establishing favourable electricity rates for home charging systems; and
- Develop
common standards for roadway signs and charging networks.
The eight states are
among a group of states which have adopted rules requiring about 15 per cent of
new vehicles sold to be zero-emission vehicles by 2025.
Collectively, the
eight signatory states represent more than 23 percent of the US car market.
Market demand created
by these state programmes can help lower zero-emission vehicle costs through
economies of scale and expand the range of product lines available to
consumers, it has been stated.
US electric car sales
in 2013 totalled about 96,000 vehicles, not quite double the 2012 total of
about 52,000, itself up from 17,000 in 2011.
It is expected that
ZEVs in California alone will rise from 60,000 in 2018 to 230,000 in 2025.
There are currently
16 zero-emission vehicle models available from eight automotive manufacturers;
nine run completely on batteries, two on hydrogen fuel cells and five are
plug-in hybrid electric vehicles that can run on gasoline as well as battery
power. The number of models is expected to increase for model year 2014 and
beyond. Several electric vehicle models have won awards for safety, performance
and customer satisfaction over the past couple of years, the eight governors
noted.
There are over 6,700
charging stations open to the public in the signatory states. By 2015 nearly
every major automaker will have zero emission vehicles available for sale or
lease, and more than 200,000 zero-emission vehicles are expected to be on the
road across the U.S.
Such clean vehicles
will provide “a major foothold” in the battle to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions and their consequences, which include sea level rise, increases in
extreme weather, and wildfire intensity, it has been stated.
There are economic
advantages as well, according to the governors of the eight US states.
Electricity is the
most widely available source of power and, according their statement, typically
costs about two-thirds less than gasoline on a per-mile basis. By 2025, the
average zero-emission vehicle driver will save nearly US$6,000 in fuelling
costs over the life of the car.
The drive for more
plug-in electric vehicles however pushes the responsibility for emissions
control to the source of the power, namely the power stations.
And hydrogen fuel
cell vehicles ideally require a fuel supply infrastructure if owners of such vehicles
wish to make extensive journeys without the risk of being stranded; and there
additional implications in terms of educating drivers as to handling new types
of fuel.
No comments:
Post a Comment