Hyundai Motor
Company, the world’s fifth largest auto manufacturer, has begun series
production of compacted graphite iron (CGI) cylinder heads for the company’s 12.7-litre
heavy duty commercial vehicle engine.
Following the launch of Hyundai’s first CGI
engine programme in 2006 with the 3-litre V6 S-engine used in Hyundai and Kia
luxury SUV applications in the domestic Korean market, the 12.7 litre L-engine
cylinder head becomes Hyundai’s sixth CGI product in series production.
This latest application has extended Hyundai’s
CGI leadership position in Asia, making it the second largest user of CGI
components world-wide.
In addition to the 3-litre S-engine cylinder
block and the 12.7 litre L-engine cylinder head, Hyundai has used CGI for the
3.9-litre F-engine and 5.9-litre G-engine commercial vehicle cylinder blocks
since 2007, as well as for high performance cylinder heads of the 5.9-litre
G-engine and all cylinder heads of the 10-litre H-engine since 2011.
Such is the extent and depth of Hyundai’s
conviction that all of the company’s CGI components are cast at the Hyundai
Jeonju foundry and the Daedong foundry in Korea, using SinterCast process
control technology.
Perhaps among the world’s automakers Hyundai
has thrown its CGI net far wider among its engine products than any other
company, with the possible exception of Ford Motor Company, which extends CGI
use from its latest Nano 2.7-litre gasoline EcoBoost engine built in the Lima, Ohio, engine plant where Ford has invested $500 million, through the Dagenham-made 3-litre V6 diesel and the Chihuahua-built 6.7-litre
EcoBoost diesel to the heavy commercial vehicle in-line six-cylinder diesele engines made in association with Koc
in Turkey. Sadly, no official figures are publicly available to reveal how much CGI each OEM processes (machines) in tonnes annually - if the figures are available they are not open to scrutiny, but Ford must be high up in the world league table, along with VW, MAN, Daf and Mercedes-Benz, and to a lesser extent Navistar, Scania, Volvo and Cummins.
Even so, the latest Hyundai application has
several implications, the most of important of these is the fact that the CGI
cylinder heads are produced using the existing grey iron foundry tooling and
are machined on the same lines as the grey iron heads.
“The direct substitution of conventional
grey cast iron with CGI provides an ongoing growth opportunity, as engines are
upgraded to mainta in market competitiveness and to satisfy future emissions legislation,”
said Dr. Steve Dawson, president and chief executive officer of SinterCast.
“Hyundai was the first OEM in Asia to adopt
CGI and has since become a world leader for CGI performance upgrades. The 5.9-,
10- and 12.7-litre CGI cylinder heads have all been introduced as upgrades of
existing grey cast iron heads, to ensure durability as the power and torque
were increased,” added Dawson.
COMMENT:
The observations derived from this development by Hyundai have to be threefold:
When an OEM uses CGI it tends to use more of it as the company’s engineers
enjoy a positive experience as well as obtain positive engine results. So far, no OEM that has adopted CGI has raised any "grumbles" about the technology; in fact, each new
CGI engine serves only to generate further CGI commitments and activities and, at this point in timer, CGI is seen as having become a mature material providing benefits and value.
Secondly, the latest project suggests that
engine upgrade is possible without engine redesign. Thus: one engine design yields one set of engine tooling and no further investment in a machining line. This
last point may be bad news for machine tool vendors but it is an important plus point in
the OEM’s purchasing department. Therefore a shift to CGI is very cost
efficient.
Finally, on the world stage, South Korea is a
relative minnow, albeit with a world-class vehicle OEM using world-class engineering
materials. Next door, China too is anxious to be a world player, but is looking moribund. Hyundai’s diesel
engine strategy is surely a wake-up call for China’s lagging commercial vehicle industry.
It remains to be seen if 2015 is the point at which China's heavy truck industry hears the wake-up call – and responds
accordingly. JM
No comments:
Post a Comment