Pressure is growing on
sales executives at Cummins Inc. to find new customers for the ISV5.0 V8 diesel
engine in the wake of the company’s latest sales dip.
Cummins faces not only a decline in emerging markets such as China and Brazil, but there is the on-going trend within the likes of Daimler’s Freightliner, Paccar and Volvo to step up levels of vertical integration.
Cummins faces not only a decline in emerging markets such as China and Brazil, but there is the on-going trend within the likes of Daimler’s Freightliner, Paccar and Volvo to step up levels of vertical integration.
The more these companies integrate their powertrain
activities the more life becomes more difficult for Cummins.
Added to which, although the Columbus, Indiana company found new business for its heavy-duty truck diesel engines at beleaguered
Navistar International, the mere fact that Navistar is itself under pressure to increase its
performance, so there is a knock-on effect for Cummins.
One hope for Cummins is that Navistar quits
the diesel engine business altogether, leaving the gates wide open.
That may take a while to happen under the
leadership of Navistar chief executive officer Troy Clarke. But it still
remains as a possibility.
Meanwhile, Cummins desperately needs new customers
besides Nissan and Toyota for its ISV5.0 turbocharged diesel engine with its compacted
graphite iron (CGI) vee cylinder block.
These two customers alone do not provide the
necessary volumes to fully justify Cummins’ investment in the programme, even
though there was initial assistance from the US Department of Energy.
Senior Cummins would like to see the number of
customers for the engine doubled. Added to which, foundry men too would like to
see a further boost in CGI vee block production with Tupy in Brazil being the
world’s largest producer of these highly specialised engine blocks that allow
increased output and/or reduced engine weight.
The problem for Cummins
The
problem is reflected in sales for the past year. Last week, Cummins Inc. posted a
lower-than-expected quarterly profit and unveiled plans to lay off up to 2,000
people as global economic weakness took its toll on the company’s international
sales. Consequently, shares of the company fell more than eight per cent.
The job cuts will affect
nearly 4 per cent of Cummins workforce of about 54,000. The cuts will be
implemented before the end of 2015 and deliver savings in year 2016 of between $160
million to $200 million.
Cummins executives
expect full-year sales to be between “flat and to down two per cent”, compared
with its previous forecast of a rise of between two and four per cent.
Cummins chief
executive officer Tom Linebarger pointed the finger at industry orders in
Brazil and China which were at “multiyear lows, with no sign that these markets
will rebound soon”.
"Given the
uncertainty in the global economy, we expect challenging conditions to persist
for some time," Linebarger said.
The company said it
would decide “in the coming weeks or months” whether further restructuring will
be necessary.
Accordingly,
Cummins reported a third-quarter net profit of $380 million, down more than 10
per cent from $423 million a year earlier.
Revenue fell almost
six per cent to $4.62 billion from $4.89 billion. US financial analysts had
expected $4.91 billion.
Cummins reported
North American sales up four per cent, but international sales slashed 18 per cent.
Sales of engines
for heavy-duty trucks in North America, however, were down nine per cent, and
Cummins trimmed its forecast for overall market size in 2015 by 4,000 units to
286,000.
The heavy-duty
truck business had previously remained resilient even though international
sales faltered.
Cummins is a
bell-weather for the US diesel engine industry and while a two per cent dip in
sales is not a catastrophe, it could be a pointer to the future. It is unlikely
that Cummins will disappear, but there are tough times ahead for the diesel
engine maker. Company executives in Columbus will be keenly watching for any
further moves in vertical integration, both at home and abroad.
1 comment:
In the North American heavy-duty truck market, Cummins must be getting squeezed on the price it can command per engine, from Navistar especially as the latter struggles to regain the market share it lost through the disastrous 'Ustian EGR' debacle, by making its trucks more price competitive.
Daimler, Volvo and Paccar, as they strive for greater vertical integration, will also be putting unit-price pressure on Cummins, albeit less directly, by their willingness to sacrifice profitability in the short term - through price discounting their in-house engine models - in order to get customers hitherto loyal to Cummins to abandon that loyalty.
Post a Comment